SEPA Comments Regarding Proposed "Mini-Storage" Development



     (Publisher's Note: The above SEPA  (State Environmental Protection Act) comment is just the cover letter from Pat Van Eaton's "Draft Report on Critical Recharge Area - Town of Eatonville." )

                                                                                                                                                                Back to Top

                                                                                                                                                                Back to Front Page



SEPA Comment...

October 7, 2003

To:                         Mayor Pro-tem Chelan Jarrett

                               Eatonville Town Council              

SUBJECT:           SEPA Checklist – Carriage House 100 Unit Warehouses

From:                    Dixie A. Walter – Citizen

Last year I read the SEPA checklist filed in the town by Carriage House, Inc. This year I am reading the same SEPA checklist filed in the town by Carriage House, Inc.It’s interesting to me that Carriage House, Inc used the exact same checklist in both applications.

Under the sub heading “Animals” Section A states: Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbird, other: Carriage House states “Robin.” Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. Carriage House has circled “deer” and “elk.” Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Carriage House states “None.”

Section b states: List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: Carriage House states, “ None Known.”

Section c states: Is the site part of a migration route? Is so, explain. Carriage House states, “No.”

This development is near the Mashell River. I understand the word “near” is subjective. And the argument says the project is so many feet from the river. However, I think Carriage House makes a big mistake when stating there is are no fish in the river. The terms “endangered species salmon” has been used over and over again by absent Public Works Director Jamieson Van Eaton. There are still some fish left in the Mashell. Along with different species of fish are smaller animals which depend on the river to survive. We hate mosquitoes. Dragonflies eat mosquitoes. Dragonflies spend their larval stage in the river, as do many beneficial insects.

Other animals which are apt to be found along or in that river are: Wood ducks, Mergansers, both tree nesting ducks which need the river to raise their young. These birds are getting scarcer and scarcer and should be encouraged to nest, not ignored.

A short list of birds should also include dippers, birds that walk under the water to forage for food. Eagles, different kinds of hawks, and other predatory fish eating birds are also dependent upon the river for survival. Herons, swallows and kingfishers are dependent on our river.  

The Mashell River supplies about half of this community’s water source. The same can be said for mammals and birds which live in the area, only in their case water supply is probably more than half at certain times of the year. Raccoons are dependent on running water.

Bear, cougar, possum, and smaller mammals also depend on the river, not just for water but, in the case of predators, for food. The river is also on the migration path of many bird species.

We are fortunate in this area to have a near pristine water supply. I’m deeply concerned that this water supply may be harmed, perhaps permanently, by toxins which can pour into the water from development such as the warehouses. Just as an example consider a meth lab in one of the units.

Under the wrong conditions poisons from such a place could get into the water and kill whatever it comes in contact with. It is my understanding that meth labs are not uncommon in such storage units.

I hope the council will give this project very careful consideration. The life of our river could be at stake. This project is to be built on a critical aquifer recharge area, CARA, I think critical is the operative word here.

I believe this SEPA checklist should be redone to portray a true and valid picture of the non-human life supported by the Mashell River. To say the river contains no fish nor serves other life forms is simply false.

Thank you, Dixie A. Walter

                                                                                                                       Back to Top

                                                                                                                                                            Back to Front Page




 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

     We Care!